When engineers search for “CNC machining tolerance ±0.01 mm”, they usually want more than basic definitions—they need practical, factory-tested instructions on how to achieve ultra-tight tolerances, what affects dimensional accuracy, and whether ±0.01 mm is realistic for their material and geometry.
Our team machines around 1,800+ precision metal parts per month, half of which fall within the ±0.01–0.02 mm range. Below is a field-tested guide based on real workshop data, measurement logs, and troubleshooting experience.
A dimensional tolerance of ±0.01 mm means the final part can only deviate by 0.01 mm above or below the nominal value.
In practice, this tolerance is considered high-precision, suitable for:
Factory note:
In our last 300-part aluminum batch (Ø12 mm shafts), the actual measurement range was +0.006 / –0.004 mm using a DMG MORI NLX series lathe with in-process tool wear compensation.
Below is a real comparative measurement from our workshop. All samples were machined using identical cutting parameters.
| Material | Achievable Stable Tolerance | Notes from Production |
|---|---|---|
| Aluminum 6061/7075 | ±0.005–0.01 mm | Excellent thermal stability; ideal for precision |
| Stainless Steel 304/316 | ±0.01–0.015 mm | Generates heat → expansion affects consistency |
| Brass / Copper | ±0.005–0.01 mm | Best material for micro-machining |
| Titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) | ±0.015–0.02 mm | Hard material; heat affects tool life |
| POM / Plastics | ±0.03–0.05 mm | Expansion + elastic deformation |
Real experience:
A POM gear housing with a ±0.01 mm requirement failed during QC because the part shrank 0.03 mm after 24 hours. This is why plastics rarely hold tight tolerances without post-temperature stabilization.
Use high-rigidity machines with thermal compensation:
Measured improvement: Switching to a thermally stabilized spindle reduced dimension drift from 0.012 mm → 0.004 mm over a 4-hour run.
Factory data:
Skipping the final “skim cut” increased final variance by 32%.
Temperature is the number one reason tight tolerances fail.
Our workshop methods:
Real measurement:
A steel shaft measured immediately after machining showed +0.013 mm, but after cooling 8 minutes, it stabilized at +0.003 mm.
For ±0.01 mm tolerance, a caliper is not enough.
Recommended tools:
QC protocol used in our factory:
| Issue | Effect | Real Case |
|---|---|---|
| Tool wear | Size drifts +0.02 mm | Titanium machining after 80 pcs |
| Thermal growth | Part expands temporarily | Stainless steel sleeve batch |
| Poor workholding | Vibration → dimensional error | Thin-wall aluminum cover |
| Wrong cutting parameters | Burrs, taper, distortion | Brass micro-components |
Based on thousands of machining hours, the following features rarely hold ±0.01 mm cost-effectively:
Cost impact:
Tightening the tolerance from ±0.05 → ±0.01 mm typically increases cost by 35–70%, depending on material and geometry.
Yes, but not for all materials or geometries. Aluminum and brass are the most stable.
Turning is more stable than milling due to better rigidity.
Design only critical surfaces with ±0.01 mm and relax other features to ±0.05–0.1 mm.