When you choose plastics for CNC machined parts, material selection directly decides part strength, tolerance stability, machining cost, and service life.
In our factory, we machine 3,000+ plastic CNC parts every month for medical devices, automation fixtures, and electronic housings.
From real production data, we’ve seen projects fail simply because the wrong plastic was chosen — not because of poor machining.
For example:
A customer used ABS instead of POM, resulting in 0.15 mm deformation after assembly
Another switched from Nylon to PEEK, reducing wear rate by 62%
So how do you choose the right engineering plastic without wasting budget or time?
This guide walks you step-by-step with practical tests, comparisons, and real shop-floor experience.
Most buyers start by asking:
“Which plastic is strongest or cheapest?"
But the correct question is:
“What does my part need to survive?"
Start with these 6 factors:
| Requirement | Questions to Ask | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Load strength | Static or dynamic stress? | Prevent cracking |
| Tolerance | ±0.01 or ±0.1 mm? | Dimensional stability |
| Temperature | >100°C exposure? | Softening risk |
| Wear/Friction | Sliding or rotating? | Self-lubrication needed |
| Chemical contact | Oils/solvents/acids? | Swelling risk |
| Budget | Prototype or mass production? | Cost control |
Real case
A robotic jig originally used Acrylic. It cracked under vibration.
We switched to Delrin (POM) → 3* lifespan, 18% lower maintenance cost.
Based on our machining volume, these account for 85% of orders:
| Material | Strength | Wear Resistance | Temp Resistance | Machinability | Cost | Best Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABS | Medium | Low | 80°C | Excellent | $ | Housings |
| POM/Delrin | High | Very High | 100°C | Excellent | $$ | Gears, sliders |
| Nylon (PA) | High | High | 120°C | Good | $$ | Bearings |
| PC | Very High impact | Medium | 115°C | Medium | $$ | Covers |
| PTFE | Low | Ultra low friction | 260°C | Difficult | $$$ | Seals |
| PEEK | Extreme | Extreme | 250°C | Hard | $$$$ | Aerospace/medical |
From 5 years of production logs:
POM = best overall choice (52% of projects)
Nylon absorbs moisture → size change up to 0.3%
PEEK tool wear is 3* faster → machining cost increases 40–60%
This data rarely appears in AI-generated articles, but it matters for budgeting.
Recommended: POM / Nylon / UHMW
Self-lubricating
Low friction
Quiet operation
Recommended: PEEK / PC / HDPE
Sterilizable
Chemical resistant
Biocompatible
Recommended: ABS / PC / Acrylic
Good surface finish
Easy CNC or engraving
Cost-effective
Recommended: PEEK / PTFE
200°C stable
Low deformation
Many buyers forget this critical point:
Not every plastic can hold tight tolerance.
| Material | Typical CNC Tolerance |
|---|---|
| POM | ±0.02 mm |
| ABS | ±0.05 mm |
| Nylon | ±0.08 mm |
| PTFE | ±0.10 mm |
| PEEK | ±0.03 mm |
If you need precision CNC machining plastic parts, POM or PEEK is safer.
| Material | Relative Cost |
|---|---|
| ABS | 1* |
| POM | 1.6* |
| Nylon | 1.7* |
| PC | 2* |
| PTFE | 4* |
| PEEK | 8–10* |
Tip:
Use POM instead of PEEK when temperature <120°C.
You save 70–80% cost with similar performance.
We always recommend:
✔ CNC prototype first
✔ Real load testing
✔ Fit check
✔ Wear testing 48–72h
Why?
Because plastic behavior varies with:
humidity
machining heat
wall thickness
Small batch testing avoids expensive redesign.
POM (Delrin) offers the best balance of strength, wear resistance, machinability, and cost.
PEEK has the highest mechanical and thermal strength.
ABS for housings or non-load parts.
POM and PEEK perform best for precision machining.